Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Budget issues pensions High salaries stories letters

acorn editorial 02102011

The root of the problem

2011-02-10 / Editorials
The story of Thousand Oaks homeowner Jerry Yeh in this week’s Acorn (see page 1) serves as an important lesson about publicly funded services: Most of us don’t think about them until something goes wrong.
Be it a burst pipeline, a gaping pothole or, in this case, a fallen tree limb, we’re always quick to point the finger at government when we’re confronted by such mishaps. But the root of the problems, especially at the local level, isn’t usually a lack of service but a lack of funding.
Take the comments of Kevin Wilson, supervisor of the city’s landscaping and maintenance department. When asked to respond to Yeh’s complaint about the lack of landscaping done in his neighborhood, Wilson admits his crew is understaffed.
Click here to find out more!
In the past five years, thanks to the city’s ongoing loss of tax revenue and other funding sources, Wilson’s staff of 33 has dwindled to 24 as employees have retired and haven’t been replaced. Those who are left must care for 29,000 trees throughout the city, in addition to their many other responsibilities.
Try as they might to meet the expectations of taxpayers like Yeh, Wilson’s crew is inevitably going to get behind in their work. Even with the help of contractors to spot overgrown trees, city maintenance workers simply can’t be expected to stay on top of every branch in the city.
So while we understand the frustration felt by Yeh and his neighbors, they need to recognize that city services are suffering everywhere, and landscaping isn’t a priority when weighed against things like law enforcement.
The fact that we don’t hear more stories like Yeh’s is actually surprising given the current state of the economy and its impact on local coffers.
A recently released budget report reveals that sales tax revenue in Thousand Oaks fell 10 percent between fiscal years 2008-09 and 2009-10, costing the city another $2.3 million for vital services.
Think about Yeh and his tree the next time you consider shopping out of town or saying no to a new business that wants to come here. Residents must find a way to balance their own wishes with the city’s need to attract new revenue.
As Yeh learned the hard way, you can’t have your tree and trim it too.
============================================================================

Broken branch breeds bad blood

2011-02-10 / Front Page
By Michelle Knight

UNHAPPY—Jerry Yeh of Thousand Oaks stands in front of a huge hole in his shrubbery caused when a branch fell from a city-maintained tree into his yard. 
IRIS SMOOT/Acorn Newspapers UNHAPPY—Jerry Yeh of Thousand Oaks stands in front of a huge hole in his shrubbery caused when a branch fell from a city-maintained tree into his yard. IRIS SMOOT/Acorn NewspapersA Thousand Oaks resident is crying foul over a 500-pound tree branch that toppled into his backyard last month, saying the city failed to properly maintain the tree despite receiving his annual fee to do just that.
When Jerry Yeh goes to pay the property taxes on his Thousand Oaks home, every year he tacks on a fee to the city to pay for street lighting and landscaping. This year the fee was $337.
Yeh and his 12 neighbors on Campbell Avenue live within one of the city’s 39 Lighting, Landscaping and Improvement districts.
Those who purchase homes in those districts are required to split the cost of city-maintained flora upkeep and street lighting expenses in the area.
Despite collecting the annual fee, the city failed to live up to its end of the bargain by not properly maintaining the tree, said Yeh, who called the city in September to ask that someone come out and trim the overgrown tree.
A trimming crew leader inspected the tree but, seeing no immediate need, decided to wait until other trees in the area needed specialized attention, said Kevin Wilson, supervisor of the city’s landscaping and maintenance department.
Yeh thinks they dropped the ball.
“I think it was too heavy,” said the 63-year-old of the overhanging branch that fell into his yard on Jan. 29, causing no damage or injury. “It was overgrown and too heavy; it’s that simple.”
Click here to find out more!
Wilson said he’s sympathetic to Yeh but doesn’t agree that the branch’s breaking off had anything to do with a lack of maintenance.
“It was a healthy tree that was growing,” said Wilson, who believes the unseasonably warm winter and high winds were the real culprits.
Warm days can cause a tree to draw more moisture from the ground, adding to its weight, he said. Also, warm weather pro- motes new growth. More branches and leaves mean more surface area to catch the wind, which can twist and turn branches until they break, Wilson said.
According to the National Weather Service, temperatures in the area reached about 80 degrees in the days leading up to Jan. 29. Also, wind gusts that week reached 44 mph and 18 mph that Saturday.
The giant limb, 12 inches in diameter, belonged to a 40-foottall silver dollar eucalyptus tree on the outside of Yeh’s backyard fence. It toppled onto his property and his neighbor’s property in the middle of the night.
Yeh, a semiretired stock trader, has lived in the house with his wife and son since 1997. The tree sits on a slope covered with shrubbery and other trees along the east side of Lynn Road and the south side of Janss Road.
Although Yeh owns the property on which the tree sits, the city maintains the slope.
“City hall insists it’s got to look nice,” Yeh said. “They can do (the maintenance); we homeowners can’t do it.”
His neighbors on the Campbell Avenue cul-de-sac, whose backyards face Lynn and Janss roads, also own the slope beyond their backyard fence that stretches to the sidewalk.
Yeh’s neighbor Pat Graham, an original homeowner, said the city and the fire department require her acre of property to be clear of weeds and debris or she’ll be fined.
The city should be fined for improper maintenance of the trees and shrubs along Lynn and Janss roads, she said.
Graham said the only time the city spruced up the slopes along Lynn and Janss roads was in 2004 for former President Ronald Reagan’s funeral procession.
Wilson said the presidential procession was a special event and called for extra attention to Lynn Road landscaping.
But his department doesn’t have the resources for that level of maintenance for all 400 acres it covers.
The last time trees in this area received a “crown cleaning,” specialized work that’s beyond the training of city landscaping crews and requires an outside contractor, was in March 2007, said Wilson, a certified arborist. The city tries to give all its 29,000 trees such attention every five to seven years, he said.
His staff of 24 workers care for 29,000 trees throughout the city, he said. In the past five years, the department has lost nine workers to retirement, and the city hasn’t replaced them.
The landscaping department is also responsible for clearing weeds and shrubs from city property, painting over graffiti and releasing beneficial insects into the environment.
To help the department, the city has two contractors, including a certified arborist, check city trees every week.
The contractor for Yeh’s sec- tion is responsible for monitoring trees from Moorpark Road to the Dos Vientos housing development in Newbury Park, Wilson said.
The contractors check the trees visually by driving by or walking the area, Wilson said. Trees in need of maintenance are reported to the department, and a crew goes out to perform the work.
“We’re trying not to let anything slip through the cracks,” Wilson said.
Yeh thinks his tree is one that did.
An avid gardener, Yeh said he was very fortunate he wasn’t in his backyard when the giant branch came crashing down.
“I could be in the morgue,” he said.

34 comments:

  1. Our California state budget has been shrinking in great, heaving spasms. K-12 education comprises almost 40 percent of that budget, yet has been hit with a far larger proportion of actual cuts. Other budget lines seem to wriggle away before proposed cuts are completed.

    Public K-12 education is fundamental to our society. It's an implicit pay-it-forward agreement made with each generation. We adults got to go to public schools; our children and then their children will get the same opportunity. The reward is an educated public, a necessary piece in our participatory democracy. Everybody wins.

    This wonderful, time-tested paradigm is being put at risk now because of drastic cuts already imposed on schools, and there are more, even bigger cutbacks pending.

    There can be no more pretending that education is going to be fine. It's to the credit of professional K-12 employees that so much of the public is unaware of the past few years' severe reductions: schools have done a superhuman job of taking the pay cuts, taking the program cuts, taking the staffing cuts, and persevering.

    But the next round of blows will almost surely cause some really noticeable, nasty changes — grossly larger class sizes, fewer choices, shorter school years — in short, not the best education we are capable of offering.

    Gov. Jerry Brown is finally showing the ugliness of what our budget really is instead of pushing debts into next year, borrowing from mythical funds and papering over gaping holes — and it is, indeed, ugly.

    He wants people to digest this "real" budget, and then he would ask the voters in June to extend some temporary taxes to stem the worst of the new cuts to education.

    I'm asking you to ask your state legislators to let this vote happen. We should all have input into how to handle our money, and input into what kind of public education we want to offer. Technology and the rest of the world aren't going to wait for us while we squabble about vehicle registration fees or how much a fishing license costs.

    © 2011 Ventura County Star. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



    Read more: http://www.vcstar.com/news/2011/feb/12/rust-ask-voters-before-gutting-public-education/#ixzz1DpJBMGox
    - vcstar.com
    February 13, 2011
    12:41 a.m.
    Suggest removal
    Reply to this post
    nickeq writes:
    ANY ONE who cares about K-12 and even CSU/UC Comm colleges should be working RID us of the Redevelopment scam which drains over $5 billion anuually as welfare for special interest developers & city Boorwocrats They can kill it with SLICK mis advertising like they did with prop 22 in Nov.

    http://database.californiapensionrefo...
    http://www.aflcio.org/corporatewatch/... TOP 100 exec over pay

    http://www.vcstar.com/news/2011/jan/1...
    http://www.redevelopment.com
    http://www.atascadero.org/files/RDA/B... CA debt issuance explained
    http://portal.countyofventura.org/por...
    http://www.californiapensionreform.co... California Pension Reform
    http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign... Debra Bowen
    http://www.coalitionforredevelopmentr...



    Read more: http://www.vcstar.com/news/2011/feb/12/rust-ask-voters-before-gutting-public-education/#ixzz1DpJM6MLH
    - vcstar.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Moorpark City Council unanimously decided Wednesday night to suspend its rental housing inspection ordinance and program.

    The council adopted the ordinance in 2006 after severalfatal disasters in Ventura County involving rental units that weren't properly maintained.

    The 2006-08 American Community Survey by the U.S. Census Bureau identified 10,752 dwellings in Moorpark, with 15.7 percent, or 1,688 units, identified as renter-occupied.

    Since adoption of the ordinance, about 365 rental units have been registered and inspected in Moorpark. Of those, 75 to 80 percent have needed remedial repairs, such as replacement of missing or nonfunctional smoke detectors, missing or inadequate water heater straps, and blocked doors and windows.

    Under the program, once a potential rental unit is identified in the city, a letter is sent to the property owner. The first-year inspection fee for a single-family residence is $180, with an annual renewal fee of $60. A two- or three-unit dwelling is $240, with a $90 annual renewal fee.

    The council in November asked city staff members to re-evaluate the program and return with alternative approaches to ensuring safe rental housing, to minimize the burden on property owners, especially those who own only one rental unit.

    Staff came back with alternatives such as allowing self-certification when only one unit is owned by the landlord, allowing three years between inspections of single-family homes, or reducing the scope of inspections.

    Joseph Fiss, the city's principal planner, said without a program, it would be a "complaint-based" system.

    "We would not know of code issues in rental or owner-occupied homes without a complaint," said Fiss.

    Some speakers Wednesday — including real estate agents and investors — said there are other sufficient landlord-tenant laws on the books, as well as safe-housing laws and city code enforcement.

    Jeff Phillips, president elect of the Conejo Simi Moorpark Association of Realtors, said the program adds undue costs to rental properties that may already be inspected under the city's code enforcement division. The program also deters people from investing in Moorpark property, he said.

    Councilman Keith Millhouse said the inspection program is highly intrusive to those living in the home and agreed there are other laws in place to protect renters.

    Councilwoman Roseann Mikos said she was reluctant to get rid of the program altogether, because the renters who most need protection are the least likely to come forward about problems.

    Mayor Janice Parvin said she was frustrated with the small percentage of rental units actually participating in the program.

    "I wish we could keep this ordinance, but it is not very effective right now," said Parvin.

    Parvin agreed with other council members that the city should implement an educational program for renters so they know their rights.

    While the rental inspection program is being suspended, a separate business registration fee required for property owners to rent out property still needs to be evaluated by a city finance committee. Property owners currently pay $90 the first year for a business registration certificate and $40 for renewal each year.

    © 2011 Ventura County Star. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



    Read more: http://www.vcstar.com/news/2011/feb/17/moorpark-suspends-rental-inspection-program/#ixzz1EGwVPUTh
    - vcstar.com

    ReplyDelete
  3. vc star 02172011 Bike lanes are being proposed along a 2.5-mile stretch of Lynn Road in Thousand Oaks, but some nearby residents say the project is an accident waiting to happen.

    A community meeting was held Tuesday night at Emmanuel Presbyterian Church for the Lynn Road Bike Lane Project, which includes the installation of bike lanes along Lynn Road north of Hillcrest Drive and south of Avenida de Los Arboles.

    The project has three parts, a south segment beginning at Hillcrest Drive that runs to Gainsborough Road, a middle segment between Gainsborough Road and Camino Manzanas, and a north segment north of Camino Manzanas that continues to an end point at Avenida de Los Arboles.

    The project is identified in the Bicycle Facilities Master Plan adopted by the Thousand Oaks City Council in 2005 and updated in 2010. It is funded by Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Fees and Federal High Priority Tea-21 funds. Both funds are restricted to be used for improving bicycle facilities in the city.

    In January 2010, the city contracted with consulting firm Hall & Foreman Inc. to prepare plans and estimates for constructing the project.

    About 60 people, mostly residents living near the project area, came to Tuesday's meeting to hear information about the different approaches and solutions for each segment of the project.

    A portion of the bike path is buffered by Lynn Ranch, which is in unincorporated Ventura County. No additional right of way is being used to build the project.

    Several residents are concerned about the city's plan to have cyclists ride alongside cars driving at high speeds on a narrow corridor along the southbound section of Lynn Road, from Camino Manzanas to Hillcrest, which is buffered by a wall separating the city and county limits.

    Lynn Ranch resident Paul Schmeer said during the meeting that he believes some area for bike riders along heavily-traveled Lynn Road is needed, but the proposed plan is not the best solution.

    Schmeer said unlike the rest of Lynn Road, the city only has 9 feet to work with between the existing pavement edge and the wall where the city limit ends, potentially trapping pedestrians on a 4-foot wide sidewalk.

    "Widening the roadway asphalt and painting a stripe for a bike lane will not calm traffic, but will maintain or up current speeds," said Schmeer.

    He added that he would like to see a path where both bikes and pedestrians can share, similar to what is found in areas such as Ventura, the Brooklyn Bridge and parts of Hawaii.

    Schmeer said the city has consulted professional cyclists who don't like the idea of a shared path because they would have to go slower and navigate around less experienced cyclists and pedestrians.

    "I just think (a bike lane) is unfortunate and once it is put in, there could be a tragic consequence," said Schmeer.

    Sherry Benson, a Thousand Oaks resident who lives near the proposed bike project and an amateur cyclist, said she wouldn't feel comfortable riding her bike even on a bike lane on Lynn Road, where car speeds usually go over the posted 45 mph speed limit.

    Chris Lynch, a Thousand Oaks city project engineer, said city officials will seriously consider the community input from Tuesday's meeting.

    "We'll take certain factors into consideration and look into alternatives, if possible," said Lynch, adding that the Thousand Oaks City Council will be making the final decision on the project at the end of March or early April.

    On the Net:

    http://tinyurl.com/4832vjl

    © 2011 Ventura County Star. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



    Read more: http://www.vcstar.com/news/2011/feb/16/to-bike-lane-proposal-raises-safety-concerns/#ixzz1EGxUpnUD
    - vcstar.com

    ReplyDelete
  4. The city of Santa Paula spiraled into deeper financial turmoil Wednesday night.

    The city's Finance Director John Quinn,

    who earlier this year led the effort to dismantle the city's Public Works Department as a cost-cutting measure,

    abruptly resigned and the council members were unable to come to a consensus on what to cut out of the budget.

    Santa Paula is facing a midyear budget shortfall of $1.8 million. It must make the cuts or raise revenues by June 30, or run the risk of bankruptcy.

    "If we don't make cuts now and we go bankrupt, someone else will come in here and make the cuts," said Councilman Ralph Fernandez. "I know I sound like the bad guy, but I don't want the city to go bankrupt."

    Emotions were high as the council attempted to cope with the enormity of the situation. The financial problems have been building for months.

    The city is out of reserves and must make cuts or it won't be able to provide city services or pay the bills.

    Fernandez said the city must entertain the possibility of closing or reducing hours at a fire station. It's a proposal that is widely unpopular with firefighters.

    The council was intending to go line by line over the budget Wednesday night, but was unable to agree on that process. Instead, the council voted unanimously to have City Manager Jaime Fontes come up with a budget plan and bring it back to the council on Feb. 28.

    Councilman Rick Cook said he was surprised that Fontes had not already come up with a budget proposal because "I have always worked with city managers who present a budget."

    The budget drama traces back to Quinn, who was growing increasingly unpopular with city employees and union leaders. They questioned the severity of the budget situation. Some council members, including Cook, were also vocal that Quinn didn't provide the financial reports that they requested.

    Council members have spent much of the last several meetings debating about how to proceed.

    Mayor Fred Robinson, for the fourth consecutive meeting, spoke sternly to the public. His frustration was palpable.

    "We have to come up with $1.8 million between now and June 30 or the city runs the risk of going into receivership," a frustrated Robinson said. "Any decision we make up here is going to be awful and no one is going to like it, but we are here to keep the city solvent."

    The city has struggled financially largely because of a drop in sales, property and gas tax revenues, siphoned by the state.

    The council has proposed 10 percent pay cuts across the board, hiring freezes, layoffs and other measures to balance the budget.

    "It's been a troubling night," Mayor Robinson said. "We ask for your help, your support and even your prayers."

    © 2011 Ventura County Star. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



    Read more: http://www.vcstar.com/news/2011/feb/17/santa-paula-finance-director-resigns/#ixzz1EHHvsjBn
    - vcstar.com

    ReplyDelete
  5. vc star 02182011 Thousand Oaks Economic Development Manager Gary Wartik has retired after 13 years with the city.

    Wartik, however, is not retiring from work.

    "I feel like I have one more career I want to have," Wartik, 65, said.

    Wartik, who's last day with the city was last Friday, is the owner of Vision Consulting Group. He plans to work with small- and medium-sized businesses to help them develop new operational goals. At the same time, Wartik plans to seek work where he can use his background in debt management. Work in the public sector also is a possibility.

    Wartik was hired by the city in 1998. As the economic development manager, he served as liaison between City Hall and the business community. Along with helping people launch new ventures in the city, Wartik worked to help businesses stay in Thousand Oaks.

    Wartik also was assigned to work with the city's Business Roundtable, a City Council-appointed body that tackles business issues and makes recommendations to the council.

    "Thousand Oaks is fortunate to have such a vibrant and diverse business community," Assistant City Manager Candis Hong said. "As Economic Development Manager, Gary played a valuable role in fostering positive relationships between city hall and the business community."

    Wartik worked closely with the Chamber of Commerce and lauded its recent rebirth as the Greater Conejo Valley Chamber of Commerce, an expansion to represent the cities of Thousand Oaks, Westlake Village and Agoura Hills.

    Wartik also served on the boards of the Workforce Investment Board of Ventura County and the Economic Development Collaborative-Ventura County. He said he is proud of the work that brought hands-on services to the small business community and improved communications between businesses and the city, as well as the jobs retained in the city.

    The city does not intend to fill Wartik's position right away. Hong will take over most of the responsibilities for the time being as officials look at where the position will fit in the organization.

    Wartik said he is looking forward to the next chapter and an opportunity to pursue passions that include higher education.

    "I may be able to use my talent and experience in that area as well," he said. "An opportunity or opportunities arise and one seizes them."

    © 2011 Ventura County Star. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



    Read more: http://www.vcstar.com/news/2011/feb/17/to-economic-manager-retires-after-13-years/#ixzz1EKPzSbg7
    - vcstar.com

    ReplyDelete
  6. Former Thousand Oaks Mayor Albert Lee Laxdal, an architect of the city's landmark slow growth policy called Measure A, died Thursday at his home. He was 78.

    Laxdal served on the City Council from 1980 to 1989, and as mayor in 1984 and between 1987 and 1988, during a pivotal time in the city's history when it faced fast growth and the proposed developments of large swaths of land.

    "He was very bright, outstanding mathematician with a heart, a great noble heart," former city manager Grant Brimhall, said. "Lee was a magnificent mayor, very humble and very willing to encourage and energize others to share their perspectives."

    Brimhall met Laxdal during his first week in Thousand Oaks as city manager, when Laxdal was a citizen activist. Their encounter, at church, was Brimhall's first argument with a resident.

    "He was an advocate of Measure A and my perspective was the free market ought to take care of it," Brimhall said. "It has been one of the major beneficial policies to bless the entire city. ... It is one of the finest public policy issues. The way it was worded, the way it was implemented and the way it has worked ... I repent of my arguing."

    Laxdal co-authored Measure A with Bob Lewis, who went on to serve on both the Planning Commission and the City Council. The ballot measure, which overwhelmingly passed at the polls in 1980, limited the amount of new residential housing developments that can be approved for construction to 500 new dwellings per year.

    "We spent many, many an hour in each other's kitchen drafting an ordinance that made sense," Lewis said. "Lee was truly the leader on it. He had a lot of foresight. He was quite a gentleman, truly a gentleman."

    Lewis said Laxdal inspired a number of people, including himself to community service. Laxdal appointed Lewis to the Planning Commission and when Laxdal retired from his council seat before the end of his second term, Lewis ran and was elected in a special election.

    "He was a man to be trusted," said Thousand Oaks Planning Commission Daryl Reynolds, who typed the first draft of Measure A and knew Laxdal through her mother's attendance at the The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, where the councilman was an active member. "He had a vision of the community too."

    Laxdal was born Dec. 13, 1933, in Portland, Ore., where he grew up and participated in local plays and productions. He married his wife,Lila, who goes by the nickname Kitch on Sept. 14, 1956. The couple had three children, Terry Wells, Karyn Holmberg and Eric, nine grandchildren and 11 great-grandchildren.

    Laxdal graduated from Lewis & Clark College in 1957 with a bachelor of science degree and earned a master of science in math at Oregon State College in 1959.

    ReplyDelete
  7. contd due to size Lee Laxdal:

    Laxdal was hired by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena in 1971, where he worked as an engineer. In 1981, he went on to work at the Aerospace Corp. as a "mission mother" for a set of inertial upper stage rockets that carried Department of Defense and NASA payloads into space.

    During his second term on the City Council, Aerospace Corp. offered Laxdal a chance to work in Australia. The councilman resigned from his seat. Kitch Laxdal described the couple's three years overseas as a honeymoon and opportunity of the lifetime. They moved back to Thousand Oaks when his work in Australia was finished.

    She said her husband was an avid reader, who loved to spend time in the yard and who loved the city of Thousand Oaks, its open space and ridgelines.

    Former Mayor Frances Prince recalled a number of trips through Thousand Oaks' back country with Laxdal as the two worked on establishing horse trails in the community.

    "He had a good sense of humor and he hung in there on the beasts," Prince said. "We had some good times, some good laughs."

    Brimhall, who also knew Laxdal through church, described him as a strong member of the church who did a lot of things behind the scenes without drawing attention to himself.

    "Lee is a very deep man spiritually," Brimhall said. "He understands the world of science in a very hands on way because of his academic training. But that coupled with his spiritual sense made him quite a unique guy to talk with, work with and argue with."

    He is survived by Kitch, his three children, eight grandchildren and 11 great-grandchildren.

    Services for Laxdal will be held Thursday at 1 p.m. at the The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1600 Erbes Road in Thousand Oaks. In lieu of flowers, people are asked to send donations to Assisted Home Hospice at 468 Pennsfield Place, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360.



    Read more: http://www.vcstar.com/news/2011/feb/21/former-mayor-Laxdal-dies/#ixzz1EePDwVJx
    - vcstar.com February 21, 2011
    6:22 p.m.
    Suggest removal
    Reply to this post
    nickeq writes:
    Good write up; I would like to know why he became one of the formers who STOPPED coming to city hall / being involved. Mayor Hus wants to be quiet, remain in back ground but attended an Auto Mall sign hearing and both the hearings at the golf course.
    Lee was a giant and will be missed. Lets see if we can make it to the funeral being on a Thursday.
    Surprised that Daryl would type Measure A as she is so much FOR GROWTH; Like all laws it should have had a sunset clause as after about 1992, it became an exercise in going through the motions.



    Read more: http://www.vcstar.com/news/2011/feb/21/former-mayor-Laxdal-dies/#ixzz1EeQ9XceU
    - vcstar.com

    ReplyDelete
  8. latimes.com/news/local/la-me-lindsay-bell-20110221,0,4945039.story

    latimes.com

    Bell's corruption scandal has boosted scrutiny of other cities

    City hall watchdogs are popping up across California to oust officials, scour public documents and organize rallies. But whether residents have rooted out corruption or just imagined it is up for debate.

    By Catherine Saillant, Los Angeles Times

    February 21, 2011

    Reporting from Lindsay, Calif.

    advertisement

    Awakened by the salary scandal in Bell, newly engaged citizens are turning out at community meetings and city halls across California, demanding public documents, asking tough questions and pushing for change.

    The common theme is suspicion that something underhanded is going on in city government. But whether residents have rooted out corruption or just imagined it is up for debate.

    In Hercules, a city of 25,000 north of Berkeley, Mayor Ed Balico stepped down in January after residents threatened to recall him. Balico was seen as being too close to a city manager who had already been pushed out following allegations that his relatives had received $3 million in affordable housing contracts.

    Redlands council members considered dismissing City Manager N. Enrique Martinez in November after residents objected to his $231,229 salary, and residents in Chula Vista pressured the City Council to study the salaries of top officials.

    Even in leafy, upscale Thousand Oaks, citizens are demanding big cuts to council members' health benefits.

    But in the wake of the civic implosion in Bell, some of the strongest tensions between a city hall and its citizens are playing out in Lindsay, a tiny city smack in the middle of the San Joaquin Valley farm belt.

    On a recent day, Lindsay's newest activists — two realtors, a corrections officer and a federal data clerk — sat around a dining room table, stacks of city documents in neat piles in front of them.

    Six month ago, Yolanda Flores, Lorena Vasquez, Steve Mecum and his wife, Delma, didn't know a general fund from an enterprise account. Now they toss the terms around like budding lobbyists, eager to explain their suspicions of malfeasance at City Hall.

    For years, Lindsay has struggled to overcome white flight, rising poverty, vacant storefronts and a 19% unemployment rate. City officials have spent tens of millions trying to reverse the slide, sprucing up walkways in the business core, building a new aquatic center and a sports and entertainment complex, and launching a Mexican-style outdoor market that reflects the city's predominately Latino population.

    But some residents, including those gathered at the Mecums' rambling home, see a dark side to the work. The city manager, they say, was overpaid at $214,405 a year and city leaders showed favoritism in awarding grants and contracts. This fall, they rallied hundreds of residents to demand salary cuts, lower water rates and greater transparency at City Hall.

    ReplyDelete
  9. contd story
    Things got so heated that City Manager Scot Townsend — the man credited with shepherding the redevelopment efforts — resigned after allegedly receiving death threats. Three other officials also quit, including the town's finance director and a City Council member. Allies said the four were weary of being verbally attacked.

    Delma Mecum, a realtor, was questioned by the Tulare County Sheriff's Department about a flier left at Townsend's home that allegedly threatened the city manager and his family. Mecum flatly denied that anyone from her group sent the flier. But the Mecums are unapologetic about Townsend's abrupt departure.

    "Things happen when no one is looking," said Steve Mecum, a correctional officer at nearby Corcoran State Prison. "And we walked into a big mess."

    Angered and in the mood for change, residents in Lindsay enlisted the help of BASTA, the grass-roots activist group that has championed reform in Bell. Lindsay is one of at least five cities in California that have turned to the group.

    Tucked against the Sierra Nevada foothills, Lindsay has one main corridor, Honolulu Street, leading into its downtown. Attractive aging brick buildings grace several blocks of a business core that includes an old movie theater with a high neon marquee and a family-run hardware store. The vibe speaks of a Mayberry past, when the city was thriving with two auto dealerships, an olive-packing plant and dozens of agricultural businesses.

    Many downtown buildings are now vacant. The surrounding neighborhoods are filled with modest, single-story homes, the kinds that flew up after World War II. The sidewalks are busy with Latino mothers pushing strollers and surrounded by children. The white farming elite still hold many positions of power, but Latinos, who make up 80% of the city's population, increasingly have joined the City Council, business groups and civic associations.

    When BASTA leaders arrived in the Tulare County city in October, armed with T-shirts and loads of advice, more than 800 residents turned out to meet them.

    Unlike Bell, however, there is no united front among Lindsay's 11,600 residents.

    At meetings, pro-City Hall forces sit across the aisle from critics and letters to the editors in the local newspaper rage back and forth between the two sides. Lorena Vasquez said she is sometimes snubbed by acquaintances at the neighborhood grocery store.

    "We've been called thugs, a Mexican cartel and rabble-rousers," she said.

    Beatrice Robinson, 32, was raised in Lindsay and remembers a tired, crumbling town with few things for young people to do. Now she sees promise.

    "The leaders in the community have done so much," she said. "Mr. Townsend spent 20-plus years trying to bring up the people who unfortunately tore him down."

    The uprising started in September when the Visalia Times-Delta published the salaries of Lindsay's top officials. Though modest in contrast to the extreme salaries handed out in Bell, the pay of the city manager angered some Lindsay residents.

    Others were upset about high water rates charged by a city-owned utility and city documents that they said revealed low-interest home loans being awarded to City Hall insiders. Vasquez, a data clerk, said she was on a waiting list for seven years before she finally gave up and bought a house on her own.

    Mayor Ed Murray said the city's critics are simply misinformed. Water rates are higher because Lindsay is unable to draw from polluted local aquifers, and Townsend's salary was higher than administrators in other like-sized cities because he was experienced in leveraging the state and federal dollars that made Lindsay shine, Murray said.

    "When we hired him, we knew we were willing to pay more to get Scot to do those jobs, and he's done them well," he said. "But people didn't want to hear about that."

    ReplyDelete
  10. contd 3rd part due to size The mayor confirmed critics' assertion that many of the low-income mortgages were being awarded to city employees. The city gives preference to police, firefighters and teachers to encourage them to live in the city where they work, he said.

    Murray believes that much of the dissent is based on misinformation, the long shadow of the scandal in Bell and frustration over the slow pace of economic recovery.

    "We are not Bell," he said, noting that council members are paid $100 a month and receive no health insurance. "We're not awarding huge salaries and we're not giving the city manager $100,000 loans. Nothing illegal has been done here in Lindsay."

    For his part, Townsend said he was disappointed to leave under a cloud but no longer feels bitter. He declined to talk about the alleged death threat.

    "We had a great run. I got paid 10% to 20% more than my counterparts," he said. "And the citizens, it's their community and they have a right to ask how much you get paid."

    Townsend now works as a real estate consultant and divides his time between Lindsay, where his oldest son is a senior in high school, and Salt Lake City, where the rest of his family settled.

    Last month when the Lindsay City Council appointed a new member, they selected a social program case manager at the local school district over nine other candidates, including Steve Mecum, Vasquez and Flores.

    Steve Mecum said he wasn't surprised, calling the social worker the hand-picked favorite of the other council members. Undaunted, he and other activists returned to City Hall the next morning to request documents relating to a local low-income housing developer.

    "We're not going back to our couch to watch television," Mecum said. "We're going to see this through."

    catherine.saillant@latimes.com

    Copyright © 2011, Los Angeles Times

    ReplyDelete
  11. toacorn 02242011
    Promises are made to be broken

    2011-02-24 / Letters
    Promises, promises. City Council members need to learn, like everyone else, to budget for change.

    The city of T.O. promised lifetime paid health insurance premiums to former and present City Council members. So now Amy Albano, the city attorney, says she’s worried the city will be subject to a lawsuit by a former or current council member if they don’t continue to receive the fully paid benefit. I doubt it.

    Besides, the city’s own attorney would never want to risk her job recommending that they reduce benefits drastically or eliminate them altogether—it would not be in her best interests. We need another opinion.

    City Council members know that they should have been getting their health benefits from their spouse’s employment or, like everyone else out there who is self-employed, from buying their own individual health insurance policies and coughing up the monthly premium. But then again, why would they? They were given a freebie.

    These are part-time positions. Things have changed. States and cities are looking for ways to save money. This was a luxury item that needs to be eliminated for past, current and future City Council members.

    When a company in the private sector realizes it can no longer provide benefits, they are cut.

    For the past decade, the rest of us have experienced cuts in benefits at work: health, life and disability insurance cut or eliminated, and premiums hiked.

    Defined benefit pension plans and profit-sharing plans have been eliminated; 401( k) matchings have been cut and salaries frozen. It should not come as a surprise that part-time council members need to take care of their personal financial matters at home or at either their primary place of employment or their spouse’s.

    Cities need to find a way to halt luxury benefits and begin tightening their belts. Sometimes promises have to be broken. Arlene Saryan Thousand Oaks
    ===============================================

    Council should cut its pay, benefits

    2011-02-24 / Letters
    Compensation for City Council members has been a topic for several months, apparently with little understanding from the council members of the public’s concern.

    After months of meetings, the city’s Finance Audit Committee has recommended a cap on the city’s contributions for health insurance. In my opinion that’s not enough, but you cannot expect council members to voluntarily reduce their income and benefits.

    To get to the crux of the matter, I have asked the state Legislature to revise the California Government Code ( Section 36516) that establishes the monthly compensation that includes aprovisionfora5percent annual increase. When the code was adopted the compensation was $600 a month; it is now three times that amount.

    The code also provides for employee benefits that are provided to regular city employees, including pension, healthcare and university tuition. This section of the code must be scrapped.

    It is not logical to provide a pension for council members, as most are fully employed with pension benefits. At one time election to the council was considered public service or civic responsibility.

    Currently the city of Thousand Oaks spends about $50,000 a year per council member for an annual cost of $250,000. The situation, in a word, is absurd.

    Eliminate the benefits and set a maximum compensation of $1,000 per month with reimbursement for expenses. I’m sure we will still find a full slate of candidates at election time. Jere Robings Thousand Oaks

    ReplyDelete
  12. toacorn 02242011 It’s lights out for N.P. Library solar panel project

    2011-02-24 / Front Page
    City decides price tag is too high
    By Michelle Knight
    knight@theacorn.com

    CRACKED—Though the solar panel project has been abandoned, the city is going forward with plans to resurface the damaged parking lot outside the Newbury Park Library. RICHARD GILLARD/Acorn Newspapers
    Thousand Oaks will not place solar panels outside the Newbury Park Library.

    The City Council’s capital facilities committee—comprising Mayor Pro Tem Jacqui Irwin and Councilmember Dennis Gillette—decided Jan. 19 the city would not pursue the $1.2-million project.

    Irwin said the committee nixed the proposal because the city had lost out on a $372,000 grant.

    “For me it’s important that projects make fiscal sense. . . . I feel uncomfortable with a payoff period that long,” Irwin said on Wednesday. “After we missed out on the grant, we just decided that fiscally it just didn’t make sense any more.”

    Gillette agreed.

    “I personally I think there will be other opportunities,” he said, referring to other grants the city could be eligible for.

    He added that the city is committed to reducing its carbon footprint and dependence on fossil fuels.

    In November, the City Council gave the go-ahead for the installation of carport-mounted solar panels in the parking lot of the library on Borchard Road.

    The city had counted on the $1.2-million cost being offset by $372,000 of funding from the California Solar Initiative—a rebate program sponsored by the Public Utilities Commission and managed through Southern California Edison.

    At that funding level, the city expected its contribution to be $440,000. Energy savings would have paid for the solar panels in 15 years.

    But the following month the city learned it was ineligible for $372,000 in funding because its rebate application was filed too late. The city asked Edison to extend the deadline, but the power company declined.

    Around Dec. 23 the city submitted another grant application.

    By that time the most the city could qualify for was about $200,000—at least $172,000 less than was originally anticipated.

    That meant taxpayers would pick up the difference, paying $612,000 instead of $440,000, and the payback period would increase to 18 to 20 years.

    Andrew Powers, the city’s public information officer, said the $400,000 in federal stimulus money that would have helped offset the solar panel project at the library will be split between two other proposed solar projects, one at the former city hall on Hillcrest Drive and the other at a city yard on Rancho Conejo Road.

    ReplyDelete
  13. T.O.-based radio station sheds old format for new

    2011-02-24 / Business
    Jill-FM is now Playlist 92.7
    By Michelle Knight
    knight@theacorn.com

    RADIO VETERAN—Pat Duffy is the station manager for Playlist 92.7, a Thousand Oaks-based radio station. The station, which broadcasts four signals in Southern California, was formerly called Jill-FM. The name and format were changed Feb. 14. Said Duffy: “If you make it good, they will come.” RICHARD GILLARD/Acorn Newspapers
    Give the audience what they want: Playlist 92.7 FM is banking on that maxim.

    On Valentine’s Day, Feb. 14, Amaturo Broadcast’s 92.7 Jill- FM, which had been playing music from the ’80s, officially changed its moniker to Playlist 92.7, promising to give listeners Southern California’s largest variety of music.

    “Right now, people want an iPod-on-shuffle; they want a Pandora,” said Pat Duffy, Thousand Oaks station manager, referring to a website where listeners can create a personalized radio station based on their tastes in music.

    Last year, Florida- based Amaturo, which broadcasts from offices and studios in Thousand Oaks and Lake Forest, Calif., launched an extensive and costly study to find out what its target audience—women ages 25 to 54—wanted to hear.

    The research revealed listeners desired a greater variety of music genres and artists, Duffy said last week in an interview with the Acorn.

    “Also, we learned women weren’t impressed by Jill’s limited 1980s playlist or feminine station name and that men dismissed Jill- FM as a chick station,” he said.

    Amaturo responded by rebranding the station, changing its format, image and attitude.

    Playlist 92.7 uses the symbol of a play button because it represents the expansive catalog of eras and artists the station now broadcasts, said operations manager Rick Shaw.

    “ If you look at anyone’s iPod, you won’t find just one genre of music,” Shaw said.

    The station, whether on the radio or the Internet, plays chart toppers from the ’70s and later and artists as diverse as Culture Club, Faith Hill, The Police, Whitney Houston and Lady Gaga.

    “People bond with their radio station,” Duffy said. “You have to make sure you’re doing it the right way, and I’m pretty sure this is it.”

    Playlist management hopes its tunes will have broad appeal.

    “ It’s the type of format people want to hear during the day,” said Linda Perry, regional sales manager. “It’s not going to offend anybody.”

    That means listeners won’t hear sleepy elevator music or heavy metal.

    “We’re not going to be playing a lot of Guns N’ Roses,” said Duffy, a 38-year radio veteran who’s managed big-name Los Angeles stations KNX 1070, KFWB 97FM and K-EARTH 101.

    Duffy came out of retirement in October to lead the Thousand Oaks station in its new direction.

    “This became a labor or love and passion instead of commerce,” said Duffy, 63, a Thousand Oaks resident since 1987. “I decided this was a lot of fun.”

    In 1992, Amaturo Broadcast Group bought the Thousand Oaks radio station formerly known as KNJO, Conejo Valley’s first.

    ReplyDelete
  14. CONTD FROM ABOVE
    The station, which opened in 1963, was then located in a small building on Moorpark Road, now a Vons grocery store. Through its door walked notable national and local figures, including Los Angeles Dodger great Sandy Koufax; radio personality Greg Lefevre, who went on to work for CNN; and Bill Smith, longtime on-air reporter for KTLA-TV.

    Being family-owned gives Playlist an advantage over larger competitors, Duffy said. The station can respond quickly to listeners and advertisers without going through layers of management approval.

    Playlist 92.7 listeners can call in, text or e-mail songs or tracks they want to hear. The only caveat: It must be a popular hit. The station generally plays requests the following day.

    Duffy says the new brand is bound to attract a larger audience and more advertisers.

    “It’s going to impact the position of the advertisers because it has a lot bigger potential to grow than the Jill program did,” he said.

    What’s more, Playlist 92.7 has no disc jockey, though live and recorded announcements occasionally tell listeners Playlist is the station they created, introduce a song and the name of the person who requested it and list upcoming community events.

    Although the Playlist brand is only two weeks olds, early feedback has been positive, Shaw said.

    Many Facebook fans have been as enthusiastic as Jery Lee about the brand change.

    “Playlist 92.7 is sweet; I love (to) listen to it on the Internet!” the fan wrote.

    A few Facebook fans had complaints, though not about the format.

    One fan said the station’s volume fluctuated and another complained that early morning recorded weather and traffic reports weren’t updated from the previous day.

    But Playlist can count among its listeners Gary Bryan, popular K-EARTH 101 radio personality. The Westlake Village resident admitted last week he listens to Playlist at home.

    “ I love the fact that Pat (Duffy) is involved,” Bryan said.

    While he was K-EARTH station manager, Duffy hired Bryan to host the oldies morning show.

    “ F o r the people that are out there, it’s a good option,” Bryan said.

    What’s next for Playlist 92.7?

    “(To) sit back and watch it grow,” Duffy said. “If you make it good, they will come.”

    For more information, visit www.Playlist927.com.

    ReplyDelete
  15. TO ACORN 02242011 editorial Your turn to sound off on taxes

    2011-02-24 / Editorials
    The recent battle between Democratic and Republican lawmakers in Sacramento over the proposed tax extension is borne of a long and downright ugly past. Most agree it began when the state couldn’t resist spending the millions of dollars that poured into California’s coffers thanks to the dot-com bonanza of the late ’90s. The state unwisely spent beyond its means and never changed course.

    Fast-forward through the most financially disastrous decade since the Great Depression, and California lawmakers are left to govern a dead-broke state that needs another $25 billion in cuts to balance the budget.

    Both sides of the aisle want something. The Dems want the GOP to agree to let voters decide through a ballot measure whether to extend higher taxes and other fees for five years. The GOP wants the Dems to get serious about real budget cuts and to streamline the state’s outrageously oppressive business regulations.

    Caught in the middle of the political wrangling are those who will bear the brunt of the $25 billion in budget cuts: the recipients of the state’s health, education and welfare services.

    School officials here in Thousand Oaks and throughout the state are lobbying state lawmakers to put the initiative on the ballot.

    State Sen. Tony Strickland (R-Simi Valley) says he does not support the tax extension and cites a poll that shows most Californians agree with him. Assemblymember Jeff Gorell (R-Westlake Village) opposes the extension also.

    It’s unknown if the Legislature can make enough progress in the coming weeks to move forward with the initiative. If the plan doesn’t get the support it needs, chances are it will be dead at least until the fall.

    We want to know whether you, our readers, support the tax extension initiative.

    Please go online to www.theacornonline.com and cast your vote in our readers’ poll: “Do you favor a ballot initiative calling for a vote on the state tax extension?”

    Let’s hear it, Thousand Oaks. On which side of the aisle do you stand?

    ReplyDelete
  16. LTR ACORN 02242011
    Say ‘no’ to water rate increases

    2011-02-24 / Letters
    Drought, really?

    Over a year ago Thousand Oaks residents saw their water rates increase 28 percent over the span of less than one year.

    Mandatory restrictions were also put into effect. Similar economic hardships and restrictions have fallen on other communities.

    My assemblyman’s office told me that the city of Moorpark suffered a significant rate increase after that city had met demands set on it to conserve.

    As of Feb. 20 all of California’s major water reservoirs are above 100 percent of their historical averages. This data can be found on the state water resources website.

    Usually peak reservoir levels occur in early April. Right now, snowpack and river levels are well above normal. Rainfall is nearly 100 percent of normal almost statewide, and we still have over a month before the wet season usually ends. During December 2010 the skies opened up a deluge of precipitation on the state.

    Shortly after Christmas I emailed the Department of Water Resources Southern Region and asked what methods are used to determine when a “drought” exists and when that condition can be lifted.

    The answer I received disturbed me: “There is no specific indicator or threshold showing when we enter or exit a drought,” he said. This official went on to describe predictions for our weather as “drier.” Really?

    I’m no expert on wholesale water prices, but this is not passing my “smell-test.” It has the odor of the manipulation of public perception.

    Politicians and bureaucrats fail to use our tax dollars wisely for improvements and expansions to our water supply facilities. Instead they raise our water rates and impose restrictions. In essence, nothing gets fixed and we pay for the luxury (sarcasm) of that failure.

    Neighbors, I am urging you all to get involved. Please write and call your Assembly representative, your state senator and others.

    Let them know you’re watching this and them. California residents must step up and speak out. Our state government is out-of-control, and the people who work in that system are not hearing enough of you. Please get involved. Timothy Bond Thousand Oaks

    ReplyDelete
  17. VC STAR 02232011 About two-thirds of the young adults in Ventura County participated in binge drinking in 2009.

    About two-thirds of all age groups said they ate fast food at least once a week, with one of 10 copping to at least four weekly dates with Big Macs or Double-Doubles.

    Nearly six of 10 adults in the county and across California were overweight or obese in 2009.

    The estimates come from the California Health Interview Survey released by UCLA last week as a measuring stick of health care statewide and in counties. It shows Ventura County residents may be smoking less and could at least be temporarily holding their own on diabetes.

    But the data, based on interviews conducted every two years with about 60,000 people across California, revealed less flattering images of people's habits in 2009 when it came to diet, alcohol, exercise and waistlines.

    "That's pretty amazing," said Dr. David Schmidt, an Oxnard cardiologist, responding to the estimate that 26 percent of teenagers in the county may not get an hour or more of exercise any day of the week.

    But many of the estimates don't surprise Schmidt.

    "I think we live in a culture where we're prone to excessive behaviors anyway," Schmidt said. "We have excessive portions in our meals. We have access to alcohol."

    About 35 percent of adults in the county were overweight in 2009, according to the survey. That's nearly the same as in 2007.

    But nearly one in four adults were obese in 2009, an increase from two years earlier when the rate was about one in five. As with many of the county estimates, statistical error could explain at least part of the gap.

    Even if obesity was the same as in 2007, it's disappointing, said Dr. Robert Levin, Ventura County public health officer.

    "What it's telling us is that the trends that have led to obesity in our society have not been stopped or turned around," he said.

    The survey defines binge drinking as five or more drinks for men at one occasion and four or more drinks for women — a standard also used by the American Medical Association. The data estimated about 36 percent of adults in the county drank at least that much at some point in 2009.

    Binges were the norm for younger people. About 66 percent of county residents 18 to 30 qualified as binge drinkers, according to the survey. But they probably don't think of themselves that way, said Susan Moffatt, a nurse practitioner at the student health center at CSU Channel Islands in Camarillo.

    "They would find that definition of binge drinking surprising," said Moffatt, referring to college students. "I don't think they equate their behavior to binge drinking."

    Dan Hicks of the Ventura County Behavioral Health Department's alcohol and drug programs cited a 2005 survey of county residents 25 and younger who acknowledged being drinkers. About 42 percent of them said they participated in binge drinking in a 30-day period.

    ReplyDelete
  18. CONTD ABOVE
    "The belief is more is better," he said.

    Other survey numbers were encouraging. About 11 percent of adults and teens in Ventura County smoked in 2009, lower than both averages and 2007 estimates in the county.

    About 8 percent of adults in the county had diabetes in 2009, according to the estimate. Two years earlier, that figure was 10 percent. The improvement is small enough that it could be caused by statistical error, which increases when researchers try to isolate smaller slices of a community.

    Levin said he's not convinced diabetes is decreasing, because the evidence suggesting weight problems in the county aren't getting better. One is linked to the other.

    "If enough people get overweight or obese, a certain proportion are going to get diabetes," he said.

    All the estimates are just that. Levin said some of what appears obvious may not be. Eating fast food once a week isn't so bad for a physically fit adult. A teen who doesn't get an hour of exercise on any day of the week but gets 30 minutes every day may be doing fine.

    But much of the data confirms what Levin already thought. People smoke less. He said they use birth control more, bringing down the rate of abortions. But most of what they do hasn't changed much.

    "I would like to think healthy behaviors are trending in a good direction," he said. "But I haven't seen it manifested yet."

    A 14-year-old boy sitting in a Camarillo McDonald's after school gets all the exercise he can handle from his track and volleyball teams along with weight-lifting after practice. He does it to get better at sports — not because it's good for him.

    He also visits fast-food restaurants four days a week, often eating a couple of cheeseburgers. He goes there because his friends do.

    "Most of the time I don't think about it," he said of his health. "It doesn't come up."

    Arthur Robles, a barber from Camarillo, said he is always thinking about his health. He doesn't eat fast food. He doesn't drink. He goes to a gym for the stair stepper and does push-ups at home. Even at Barnes & Noble, he leaves his car across the parking lot to make the walk a little longer.

    Rattle off the estimates about exercise and eating in Ventura County, and they don't surprise him. He sees the same thing every day at his barbershop.

    "I had to buy bigger chairs," he said.

    "Their rumps didn't fit."

    The survey shows ...

    11 percent of Ventura County adults said they have seriously thought about committing suicide.

    14 percent of all county residents say they don't have a regular doctor or clinic where they go for care.

    21 percent of county women 30 and older have never had a mammogram.

    88 percent of county adults say they didn't have more than one sex partner in 12 months.

    — Ventura County data from the 2009 California Health Interview Survey

    © 2011 Ventura County Star. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



    Read more: http://www.vcstar.com/news/2011/feb/23/survey-finds-booze-fast-food-and-obesity-rampant/#ixzz1ErCQ9Khw
    - vcstar.com

    ReplyDelete
  19. Ventura County's health habits
    Suicide
    11%
    of Ventura County adults said they have seriously thought about committing suicide.

    Medical care
    14%
    of all county residents say they don’t have a regular doctor or clinic where they go for care.

    Mammograms
    21%
    of county women 30 and older have never had a mammogram.

    Sexual activity
    88%
    of county adults say they didn’t have more than one sex partner in 12 months

    Smoking

    Teen alcohol use
    Male Female
    Teen marijuana use
    Male
    Female
    Binge drinking
    Male
    Female
    Source: California Health Interview Survey, 2009


    Read more: http://www.vcstar.com/news/2011/feb/23/survey-finds-booze-fast-food-and-obesity-rampant/#ixzz1ErCyWeGj
    - vcstar.com

    ReplyDelete
  20. VC STAR 02232011 The Ojai City Council made it clear this week that it opposes any development plans for areas north of Ventura city limits, an idea currently being studied by the Ventura City Council.

    Voting 4-1 Tuesday night to oppose the idea and send a letter to Ventura, the Ojai panel expressed concern about proposals to build upscale homes in the Cañada Larga Valley and areas along North Ventura Avenue.

    "It is very appropriate for us to take a very strong stand against any development," Councilman Paul Blatz said.

    Councilwoman Sue Horgan cast the lone no vote, saying she was worried such action would be seen as "just another knee-jerk Ojai reaction. I think it's premature to do anything, but I agree we need to follow the situation very, very carefully."

    While acknowledging the Ventura City Council had postponed discussion of annexation until after a $45,000 study of the fiscal impacts, the Ojai resolution made it clear any encroachment on unincorporated land will be opposed.

    "While (Ventura) has removed these two extensions from its environmental review process, the concept of this change remains very real for the citizens of the Ojai Valley. The city of Ojai has gone on the record as calling for a very complete environmental review of impacts on the city of Ojai," the letter reads.

    "This resolution is our formal statement of opposition to any project that includes those two areas that extend beyond the current boundaries of the city of San Buenaventura."

    Ojai Mayor Carol Smith proposed having the letter adopted as a resolution "to give it more weight."

    Several people spoke out Tuesday against any proposed development of the area, including Jim Hines of Ventura Citizens for Hillside Preservation. He said development would lead to rechanneling of the Ventura River and affect air and water quality in Ojai.

    "I urge you to pass a resolution opposing annexation of land," Ojai resident Suza Francina said. "For those of you who haven't (spent time in the affected area), you will have a real passion for the day if you spend a day there."

    The Tuesday council meeting was the first for new Ojai City Manager Rob Clark, who answered questions on a number of issues, including lighting for the new skate park and funding for the Ojai Visitors Bureau, both of which were approved.

    "I'm very appreciative of the City Council and its faith in me and I'm pleased to be here," Clark said.

    © 2011 Ventura County Star. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



    Read more: http://www.vcstar.com/news/2011/feb/23/ojai-council-opposes-development-north-of/#ixzz1ErEsXM1G
    - vcstar.com

    ReplyDelete
  21. vc star 02242011 Albert Lee Laxdal (1933 - 2011) | Visit Guest Book


    Albert Lee Laxdal passed away peacefully at home, surrounded by his wife of 54 years and other loving family members.
    Lee was born Dec. 14,1933 in Portland, Ore., to Eggert Albert and Lois Baumgarten Laxdal. He spent his youth in Portland, becoming involved in local plays and productions which is where he met his wife, Kitch (Lila). They were married Sept. 14, 1956. During that time, Lee fell in love with math and graduated from Lewis & Clark College. He received his Master's in math at Oregon State Colllege.
    He was soon hired by JPL in Pasadena, where he worked for many years and was involved in many early space exploration missions. During these years he also became a loving father to Terry, Karyn, and Eric. He spent every weekend making fun family memories in the mountains or beach, county fair or boat show. If there was somewhere to be, Lee didn't want to miss it. The family spent two years in Washington state while Lee worked for Boeing, but was soon back in the southland. Lee took a job at Aerospace Corporation and stayed there until the time of his illness. He worked as a Senior Project Engineer in Space Flight Operations. He was known as the family Rocket Scientist.
    During the 1980s he served two terms as city councilman and twice was mayor of Thousand Oaks. His work was instrumental in slowing growth in Thousand Oaks as well as protecting our beautiful ridge lines. He was known for his beautiful voice and participated in many church and community productions as a narrator or vocalist. In 1973 Lee and his family joined the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and he remained true to his chosen faith. He served in many callings but especially enjoyed being a ward missionary.
    Lee is survived by his wife, Kitch, and his children, Terry Wells (Ryan), Karyn Holmberg (Jim), and Eric (Lisa). He leaves behind eight grandchildren and 11 great-grandchildren. He was preceded in death by his parents and a granddaughter, Shannon.
    Services will be held 1 p.m. Wednesday, Feb. 23 at the LDS church. All who knew and loved Lee are invited to attend.
    In lieu of flowers please send donations to Assisted Home Hospice at 468 Pennsfield Pl., Thousand Oaks, CA 91360.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Home » Blogs » Paul Shigley's blog
    Jerry Brown, The Voice Of Reason
    Submitted by Paul Shigley on 10 February 2011 - 2:55pm
    California Paul Shigley state budget
    This is how far out of whack things have gotten in Sacramento: Jerry Brown is now the one who sounds sane.

    Earlier this week, Brown canceled the planned sale of 11 state-owned office complexes to a group of private investors calling themselves, ironically enough, California First. The deal would have netted the state about $1.2 billion, equal to roughly 5% of the state budget deficit.

    I hated the idea and said so last April. The Legislature didn’t think much of the sale either, but members held their noses and voted for it as part of the state budget package. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who was a savvy real estate investor before he became governor, gave lawmakers no choice. Rather, the governor who claimed to spurn budget gimmicks charged forward with the plan to sell commercial real estate in a lousy market and to spend the one-time proceeds on continuing expenses. Thankfully, former members of state building authorities in Los Angeles and San Francisco – whom Schwarzenegger fired for daring to disagree with him – tied up the sale in court long enough for Brown to kill the scheme.

    In canceling the deal, Brown cited a Legislative Analyst’s Office study that equated the sale to a 35-year loan at 10.2% interest, or double the interest rate the state pays on its general obligation bonds. According to the LAO study released in November, the sale would end up costing the state an extra $6 billion over 35 years.

    Brown charitably called Schwarzenegger’s plan “short-sited” and “not prudent.” Instead, the new/old governor proposes borrowing $1.2 billion from special fund reserves and paying the money back over three years at a total cost to the general fund of about $18 million.

    Now, remind me again which governor is the fiscally responsible Republican and which one is the tax-and-spend Democrat with far-out ideas.

    – Paul Shigley

    ReplyDelete
  23. Tim Herdt, a columnist and Sacramento bureau chief for The Star, recently wrote a column, as well as several articles, regarding Gov. Jerry Brown's proposed elimination of redevelopment agencies throughout the state. As elected mayors of two of Ventura County's cities and chairs of their respective redevelopment agencies, we are concerned that a balanced perspective beyond the myopic eyes of Sacramento look more carefully and open-mindedly at the real issues in the current budget debate.

    While a major focus this year of Brown's proposed budget-balancing act has been the elimination of redevelopment agencies in order for the state to benefit in the short term from the cessation of local economic development activities, the real problem remains very basic — the state needs to live within its means.

    As stewards of our local agency budgets we have all learned to take the steps necessary to annually balance our budgets, and to look to the future of our communities with the recognition that we must also balance jobs and housing to provide for the economic growth that keeps our cities — and our finances — healthy and thriving.

    When the national and state economy took a cyclical downturn over the past few years, our cities anticipated a revenue decline and cut our spending to match the decline. We took the necessary and difficult steps to cut our work force and some important programs to live within our means. At the same time we continued to invest in our communities through our redevelopment agencies, building needed infrastructure such as roadways and sewers that were vital to our citizens, even as the redevelopment agencies themselves were seeing a decline in revenues as property taxes fell.

    Unfortunately, the state has never, in our current economy, been able to successfully confront a declining revenue stream and has continued to spend without the political will to cut their expenses to match their income. Each year they have cobbled a budget together through unrealistic income projections (which always makes the ensuing year worse), borrowing more through indebtedness, and taking from both the individual taxpayer and other government agencies wherever they felt that it was politically feasible.

    They have now come to the point that they must recognize that their debt load has become beyond their means; they are now forced to no longer pass on debts to future generations. But rather than look at alternatives to live within their current revenues and find a longer term solution to the debt crisis they have put themselves in, they have chosen to begin the process of taking over other governmental agencies to support their spending addiction. Instead of looking at perhaps multi-year reduction plans, reverse spending priorities, or yes, even economic development, they have chosen to begin the dismantling of our governmental structure.

    ReplyDelete
  24. contd from above
    Redevelopment agencies are designed to invest in needed infrastructure to entice private-sector development, and to leverage those public investments to bring forth many times a multiple in private-sector investment in jobs and building. This in turn provides jobs for our citizens, increasing revenues for both the state and cities, and a resulting thriving economy. Redevelopment agencies also dedicate, and are required to spend, at least 20 percent of their revenues to assist those who cannot afford housing in our localities, a dedicated revenue that most assuredly will not be provided by the state if the governor is successful in his quest.

    While most people throughout the state until now had most likely never heard of or understood what redevelopment agencies are continuing to do in our economy, it was simply because these agencies were successfully doing it largely in the background of the governmental structure. As such, it appears that they have become a relatively easy target for Brown since these agencies have no political following or public-interest group support base.

    What is critically important to recognize, however, and what Herdt's column seems to have missed the point on, is that these actions set a precedent that every other governmental entity and community needs to be alarmed about. While this year the state may feed its budget beast with the nourishment of redevelopment agencies and economic development, next year it may be special districts such as fire protection, parks and recreation, or consolidation of local police services, or other similar "cost cutting" measures that our governor and Legislature might dream up.

    We need to somehow get a message through to Sacramento's politicians that the state must learn to live within its means and develop a plan to work itself out of debt without taking the next step in sacrificing our state's future through the eradication of effective economic development. They must stop feeding the budget beast and begin to face economic realities.

    Janice S. Parvin is mayor of Moorpark. Robert O. Huber is mayor of Simi Valley.



    Read more: http://www.vcstar.com/news/2011/mar/06/stop-feeding-the-budget-beast-and-face-realities/#ixzz1FyaFf4Xp
    - vcstar.com

    ReplyDelete
  25. Hello Thousand Oaks citizens lets see who will join me and go to this wonderful redevelopment abuse conference. This is the semi annual meeting on April 9 in Glendale. This conf. is for all Southern California so this makes it very close to us and it's being held at a hotel that is also the victim of Mr. Rick Caruso.

    It would be great if we can get to a large contingent of Thousand Oaks residents especially because chair Norby for the first time has REDUCED the registration from $65 to $45 which I know is a BIG a subsidy for the people attending. With the Brown proposal attending this conference IS a priority and you can make a big contribution by telling about Lakes and even the auto Mall fiascoes here in Thousand Oaks and they will give us up to half an hour to tell our story. Let see who from the council will share our concern. Please read the links to the articles too. Thanks Nick Quidwai
    =====================================

    Municipal Officials for Redevelopment Reform (MORR) Invites You to the 16th Annual Southern California
    Conference on
    Redevelopment Abuse
    April 9 (Sat.) 8:30-4:00

    Golden Key Hotel
    123 W. Colorado St., Glendale
    Free Parking Available at Elks Lodge, 120 E. Colorado Blvd.
    Registration:$45.00

    Includes Continental Breakfast, Lunch & all Programs


    MODERATOR: ASSEMBLYMAN CHRIS NORBY (R-Fullerton)

    Join Ray Patel at his Golden Key Hotel, standing up to the redevelopement land grab.
    Eminent domain for mega-mall owner!

    Learn about Governor Brown's plan to abolish Redevelopment Agencies,
    restoring the money to schools & services.





    "Redevelopment funds come directly from local property taxes that would otherwise pay for schools and core city and county services such as police and fire protection and care for the most vulnerable in our society"
    ---Governor Brown's 2011 State of the State Address



    Who Should Attend:
    City Officials
    concerned about the growing fiscal and land use distortions caused by redevelopment.
    School Board Members
    concerned about adequate public education funding.
    County Officials
    Concern about redevelopment tax diversions draining public seervices.
    Homeowners
    fighting redevelopment agency land grabs that threaten their neighborhoods.
    Business Owners
    outraged that their own tax dollars are subsidizing big box competitors who are trying to put them out of business.
    Attorneys
    learning new ways to help their clients defend themselves against agency abuses.
    Journalists
    seeking to expose local abuses by redevelopment agencies.
    For more information, call (714) 981-8474

    Printable Register Form



    Redevelopment Home Page

    http://www.ocregister.com/opinion/pension-290898-state-public.html
    March 7, 2011 12:15 p.m.
    Steve Greenhut: Pensions pushing California to the brink

    By STEVEN GREENHUT
    --





    Make-or-break week looms on California budget » Ventura County Star
    Make-or-break week looms on California budget » Ventura County Star
    POSTED BY EKBAL AT 8:00 PM 0 COMMENTS
    Stop feeding the budget beast and face realities » Ventura County Star
    Stop feeding the budget beast and face realities » Ventura County Star
    Los Angeles mayoral race: At least seven candidates consider running in 2013 - latimes.com your favorite Lakes dude CARUSO may run!! Nick
    Los Angeles mayoral race: At least seven candidates consider running in 2013 - latimes.com
    POSTED BY EKBAL AT 12:10 AM 0 COMMENTS
    Editorial: Slowly forward in Thousand Oaks sign debate » Ventura County Star
    Editorial: Slowly forward in Thousand Oaks sign debate » Ventura County Star

    IQBAL QUIDWAI
    EVERY DAY MATTERS!!
    PO Box 824
    Newbury Park CA 91319-0824
    i.quidwai@gmail.com

    http://cctoaks.blogspot.com/
    NO registration needed
    http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001597299471
    Concernedcitizensthousandoaks NickQuidwai

    Voice (805) 390-2857 Fax (805) 277-0625

    ReplyDelete
  26. "The days of government workers receiving free benefits and pensions without risk, those days are coming to an end because everyone else who pays for government services is paying more for their health insurance, like myself, and running the risk of a 401(k) as part of their retirement savings. Government is changing to match what the rest of middle-class America is enduring today."

    "It's not a matter of fairness," he said. "It's a matter of evolution."

    Hetty Rosenstein, the New Jersey director of the Communications Workers of America, which represent New Jersey government workers in several fields, says she gripes about her members' pensions are misplaced.

    "There's pension envy because people who are working in the private sector, they're being denied pensions," she said.

    ___

    Associated Press writers Carrie Antlfinger in Milwaukee and John Seewer in Toledo, Ohio, contributed to this report.



    Read more: http://www.vcstar.com/news/2011/mar/08/anger-brews-over-government-workers-benefits/#ixzz1G7lVcnKA
    - vcstar.com

    ReplyDelete
  27. When Erin McFarlane looks at public workers, she sees lucrative pension benefits she doesn't ever expect to get. And it makes her mad.

    "I don't think that a federal employee or government employee is worth any more than anybody else who does their job and does it well," said the Slinger, Wis., woman. She's been working a couple of bartending jobs since January, when she was laid off from her job at a Harley Davidson plant after almost a decade.

    She's not alone in seeing public servants as public enemies in some ways. For some everyday Americans, it's a case of pension envy.

    For McFarlane, 36, it's part of a ubiquitous discussion, at the bars where she works and on Facebook. And it's the center of some of the biggest political battles playing out in state capitals across the country as governors say their states can no longer afford the benefits that public employees have been promised.

    Government workers in McFarlane's state have rallied for weeks against Gov. Scott Walker's efforts to take away many collective bargaining rights, saying that would amount to killing the middle class.

    A USA Today/Gallup poll last month found that Americans largely side with the employees, though about two in five that want government pay and benefits reined in.

    Tony Christoff, a 38-year-old stay-at-home dad in Perrysburg, Ohio, said he believes public workers such as police officers and teachers - including his wife - should be rewarded.

    "They go over and above and deserve the pay they get," he said.

    That's not a unanimous view, though.

    Barbara Davis, a retiree from Cherry Hill, N.J., has been watching public workers in rallies in Madison, Wis., as well as Trenton. She says the protesters are wrong about tightening benefits hurting the middle class.

    "I'm sorry, but what they're doing is telling off the middle class," said Davis, 76, and a co-chairwoman of the Cherry Hill Area Tea Party. "The middle-class people don't get all the goodies that they do."

    At its heart, the issue is this: Some public workers get a sweet deal compared to other workers. And it's taxpayers who pay for it.

    That's set off resentment in a time when economic doldrums have left practically everyone tightening their belts. Many people have found their tax bills rising even if their earnings haven't.

    In Davis' case, it's the property tax that smarts. She and her husband pay about $12,000 per year for the house she describes as a three-bedroom "tract home." That's a high tax even in New Jersey, where the average property tax bill tops $7,000 and where the Tax Foundation has found homeowners pay three and a half times the national median.

    A half century ago, industrial jobs at car and steel plants provided high salaries and rich benefits. But as manufacturing moved overseas, many formerly well-paid workers had to take lower-paying jobs. By the end of the Great Recession, the economic order was undeniably changed.

    "It's the government sector worker who's the new elite, the highest-paid worker on the block," said David Gregory, who teaches labor and employment law at New York's St. John's University.

    For instance, most non-uniformed public employees who have worked in New Jersey for 30 years with an ending salary of $85,000 can look forward to retiring at 55 with an annual pension of about $46,000. Working until age 60 and a salary of $90,000 can bring a pension of $57,000. And many of the New Jersey's public-sector retirees have no or low premiums for their health insurance.

    ReplyDelete
  28. contd part 2 of above

    For a private-section worker who retires at 55, relying solely on a 401(k) without an employer match, it would take a $100 contribution to a plan every week for 30 years and getting an annual return over 7 percent to get to the same level of pension benefit as the public worker retiring at that age. Those benefits would run out after 25 years for the 401(k) retiree.

    To be fair, most public-sector retirees don't get such rich pensions. New Jersey's Treasury Department says the average annual pension due state workers who retired between July 2009 and June 2010 was just over $30,000 per year; for local government employees, it was about $20,000.

    And the members of the state's two biggest public employee retirement systems are required to pay 5.5 percent of their base salaries into the pension funds.

    St. John's Gregory says the rest of the benefits are deferred compensation promised to workers instead of better salaries.

    National data compiled by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics confirms that public-sector workers do better when it comes to pensions and benefits.

    As of last September, professional and management workers in the private sector were making $34.91 in hourly salary; public sector professionals made $33.17 an hour.

    The government entities spent 1.7 times as much on health care per employee-hour worked and nearly twice as much on retirement costs. Public-sector workers - who are more often represented by unions - are far more likely to have defined-benefit pensions with promises to pay for the retirees' whole lives.

    Olivia Mitchell, a professor of insurance and risk management at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School, says the data aren't perfect. They don't compare workers with the same education or experience levels, and they cover a broad range of jobs. Also, she said, they don't take into account that about one-fourth of public workers aren't covered by Social Security.

    There's one clear downside for the public employees: "We also know that the public-sector pensions are in deep trouble financially," Mitchell said, pointing to studies that suggest that they're underfunded by a total of $3 trillion, largely because governments have skipped payments. "Exactly what will be done about that, nobody knows."

    Unchanged, those retirement systems could eventually stop paying entirely.

    "One way or another, if we don't make changes, the government will collapse," said Abel Stewart, of Toledo, Ohio.

    ReplyDelete
  29. part 3 article continue due to
    Stewart, 36, the director of contemporary worship at a Methodist church in suburban Toledo, says he has a hard time conjuring sympathy for the government workers he's seen protesting because of all the time he has spent working with struggling immigrants.

    "These are middle-class people who have a house, who have enough food, who are complaining they don't have enough," he said. "Instead of fighting for their piece of the political pie, they'd be better looking at how to live within their means."

    Jeff Nash, a Democrat elected to the county freeholder board in union-heavy Camden County, N.J., has come to believe that public employees need to sacrifice.

    "The days of government workers receiving free benefits and pensions without risk, those days are coming to an end because everyone else who pays for government services is paying more for their health insurance, like myself, and running the risk of a 401(k) as part of their retirement savings. Government is changing to match what the rest of middle-class America is enduring today."

    "It's not a matter of fairness," he said. "It's a matter of evolution."

    Hetty Rosenstein, the New Jersey director of the Communications Workers of America, which represent New Jersey government workers in several fields, says she gripes about her members' pensions are misplaced.

    "There's pension envy because people who are working in the private sector, they're being denied pensions," she said.

    ___

    Associated Press writers Carrie Antlfinger in Milwaukee and John Seewer in Toledo, Ohio, contributed to this report.



    Read more: http://www.vcstar.com/news/2011/mar/08/anger-brews-over-government-workers-benefits/#ixzz1G7mmAxUR
    - vcstar.com

    ReplyDelete
  30. The headline for above is Anger brews over government workers' benefits
    GEOFF MULVIHILL
    Posted March 8, 2011 at 3:08 a.m., updated March 8, 2011 at 3:08 p.m.
    http://www.vcstar.com/news/2011/mar/08/anger-brews-over-government-workers-benefits/

    Read more: http://www.vcstar.com/news/2011/mar/08/anger-brews-over-government-workers-benefits/#ixzz1G7nVUXak
    - vcstar.com
    B_BOP writes:
    Frequently Asked Questions about the Budget Adjustment Bill For Wisconsin:

    • What happens if we don’t pass this budget repair bill?
    We are left with a situation where unless quick and decisive action is taken the state will run out of money by July 1st to fund our prisons and take care of our most vulnerable citizens on Medicaid. We also will be forced to lay off up to 1500 workers in the upcoming weeks and up to 6000 in the next biennium.

    • Why is the Governor rushing through radical changes that would take away rights from workers, without making any effort to talk to those workers, much less negotiate a fair agreement with those workers?
    We are not rushing; we are moving quickly in a clear and transparent fashion because we need to act swiftly and decisively to bridge the $137 million gap for FY2011 and the $3.6 billion shortfall for the next biennium in order to keep Wisconsin fiscally solvent. We cannot possibly move quick enough to address our state’s near double-digit unemployment rate and our crippling deficits. The Joint Finance Committee held over 17 hours of public testimony on this bill – something the previous administration

    • Why can’t we re-open contract negotiations?
    After nearly 17 months of no concessions state employee contracts were quickly ratified after the November elections and attempted to be pushed through the legislature in a lame duck session in December despite Governor Walker asking that negotiations remain open. After the Democrat controlled legislature failed to pass contracts in December, union heads—including AFSCME Wisconsin leader Marty Beil said “We will make no overtures toward them.” We can no longer accept short term fixes and kick the tough decisions down the road. Union leaders who say they are willing to accept the 5% and 12% are using it as a red herring. These are the same people who tried to ram through a contract in December without negotiation, and who a week ago said they couldn’t afford the 5% and 12%. Over the last decade the average state employee contract was signed 15 months late (even though they contained compensation increases) and until a new contract is signed the existing one stays in place. We do not have that kind of time.

    March 8, 2011
    4:59 a.m.
    Suggest removal
    Reply to this post
    B_BOP writes:
    • Why do we need to move so quickly on passage?
    Department of Administration Secretary Mike Huebsch says for the state to realize debt restructuring savings in the budget repair bill, the legislation must be passed this week. Since the state is required to make debt service payments on March 15, the bill must be enacted by Feb. 25th to allow time to sell the refinancing bonds. Governor Walker has also indicated if we do not meet this deadline he will have to begin to lay off more than 1,500 state employees.

    ReplyDelete
  31. bpop continues
    • Didn’t you create this budget deficit by passing all those tax breaks in January?
    The truth is that the tax bills enacted by the legislature and Governor Walker have a $0 impact on the current fiscal year. The State of Wisconsin was facing a $137 million budget shortfall in fiscal year 11 before passage of the bills, and it is facing a $137 million budget shortfall after enactment of the legislation. The economic growth bills do not apply to this fiscal year.

    • Didn’t the Legislative Fiscal Bureau say we had budget surplus?
    When read in isolation the memo does show a $121.4 million general fund gross balance as of June 30, 2011 and a net balance of $56.4 million. However, the rest of the memo spells out at least $315.7 million in unpaid bills or expected shortfalls in programs such as Medicaid services for the needy (153.2 million alone), the public defender’s office and for corrections. In addition we owe Minnesota, $58.7 million dollars for income tax reciprocity (for which we are paying a daily fine of $4500) and we must pay back a $200 million raid on the Patients Compensation Fund.

    • Why were police and fire exempted? Is this political payback?
    There are 314 fire and police unions in Wisconsin. Only four of them endorsed Governor Walker last fall and did not contribute large sums of money to his campaign. Wisconsin Statutes have long treated police and fire very differently when it comes to a whole series of rights and responsibilities. We cannot afford to have police and fire walk off the job for even a short period of time like many teachers did last week.

    • Why are you trying to balance the budget entirely on the backs of the union?
    We are asking for $300 million in concessions by the end of the next biennium or, less than 10 percent of our massive deficit. Truly putting the deficit on the backs of the union would be the alternative: 1,500 public employee layoffs in the next several weeks and 6,000 by the end of the next biennium.
    On the positive side, this plan will allow wages to grow with inflation, something that hasn’t happened since the contracts expired almost 2 years ago. We are also giving local control to voters to let them decide if they want compensation increases above the cost of inflation for their teachers.



    Read more: http://www.vcstar.com/news/2011/mar/08/anger-brews-over-government-workers-benefits/#ixzz1G7nn0RIE
    - vcstar.com

    ReplyDelete
  32. bpop continues
    B_BOP writes:
    • Why are you asking public employees to take such a large hit?
    Employee salary and fringe benefits currently comprise more than 60% of state government’s general purpose revenue operation costs and more than 75% of total school district expenditures statewide. Therefore, we must give state and local government, including school districts, the tools to address how to control costs in the largest area of their budgets. We are asking that public employees pay 5.8% of their retirement fund beginning April 1st. The state and local government has being paying close to 100% of this contribution for years. This is no longer sustainable. In addition, each state employee will contribute 12.6% towards their health care costs beginning April 1st. Presently, state employees contribute roughly 6%. The national average for workers’ contributions in the private sector is 25% so this is not an unreasonable request of our state workers. A study by The Segal Co., a private benefits firm, that looked just at state government workers across the nation showed a majority paying between 20% and 60% of their premium costs for family coverage. If Wisconsin workers are paying around 6%, that puts them in the bottom fifth nationally among state employees and will still put them below the national average.

    The proposed changes would cost the average state employee an additional $1,560 per year for family coverage, but the amount they would pay ($2,496) would still be significantly less than the $3,875 average premium contribution at large private sector employers in southeastern Wisconsin.

    • What does this mean for local government workers’ health insurance?
    Local government employers that do not participate in the state health insurance plan will still be able to choose the amount they wish to contribute to their employees’ health care plans.

    • Why are you dismantling collective bargaining rights of public employees? What does that have to do with fixing our budget deficit?
    We are not dismantling collective bargaining. Public employees are not losing their rights. They can still negotiate salaries, and they can still be a member of the union on a voluntary basis.

    ReplyDelete
  33. bpop continues • This is a fiscal issue for several reasons:
    Example #1 WEA Trust
    Currently many school districts participate in WEA trust because WEAC collectively bargains to get as many school districts across the state to participate in this union run health insurance plan as possible. Union leadership benefits from members participating in this plan. If school districts enrolled in the state employee health plan, it would save school districts up to $68 million per year. Beyond that if school districts had the flexibility to look for health insurance coverage outside of WEA trust or the state plan, additional savings would likely be realized.

    Example #2 Viagra for Teachers
    The Milwaukee Teachers’ Education Association (MTEA) tried to use a policy established by collective bargaining to obtain health insurance coverage that specifically paid for Viagra. Cost to taxpayers is $786,000 a year.
    Reference: http://abcnews.go.com/Health/milwauke...

    Example #3 Unrealistic Overtime Provisions
    On a state level, the Department of Corrections allows correctional workers who call in sick to collect overtime if they work a shift on the exact same day. The specific provision that allows this to happen was collectively bargained for in their contract. Cost to taxpayers $4.8 million.

    Example #4 Paid-Time Off for Union Activities
    In Milwaukee County alone, because the union collectively bargained for paid time off, fourteen employees receive salary and benefits for doing union business. Of the fourteen, three are on full-time release for union business. Milwaukee County spent over $170,000 in salary alone for these employees to only participate in union activities such as collective bargaining.

    Example #5 Surrender of Management Rights
    Because of collecting bargaining, unions have included provisions in employee contracts that have a direct fiscal impact such as not allowing management to schedule workers based on operational needs and requiring notice and approval by the union prior to scheduling changes.



    Read more: http://www.vcstar.com/news/2011/mar/08/anger-brews-over-government-workers-benefits/#ixzz1G7oPidTq
    - vcstar.com

    ReplyDelete
  34. bpop continues
    March 8, 2011
    5:02 a.m.
    Suggest removal
    Reply to this post
    B_BOP writes:
    • Does this bill decertify public unions?
    No. Although the state and local government would no longer administratively deduct union dues from paychecks individuals could still choose to send their dues in directly. Additionally, an annual vote must be taken to certify union representation.
    How will state and local workers have any protections if this bill passes?
    Wisconsin has some of the most comprehensive civil service protections in the nation and those remain in place. The appeal and grievance process through Wisconsin Statutes s. 230.44 and Wisconsin Administrative Code ER 46 currently protect the job rights of thousands and non-represented employees and will do the same for represented employees.
    In addition, the changes made by the Joint Finance Committee require that local units of government also establish a civil service system and any grievance procedure must contain a) a grievance procedure that addresses employee terminations; b) employee discipline; and c) workplace safety.

    • Will state employees still have to take furlough days after July 1, 2011?
    No. Governor Walker’s budget repair bill contains no furlough days and he has promised his 2011-13 budget will not contain any either. While existing furlough days put into place by Governor Doyle will still have to be carried out, once July 1, 2011 occurs state workers will be getting back what is the rough equivalent of 3% of their pay back. This will help offset some of the additional costs of pension and state health insurance increases.

    • As an elected official are you making these same sacrifices?
    Yes. Since being elected in 2005 I have consistently donated any raise in salary from the previous session to local charities in my district. I do not take sick leave and have authored legislation to abolish it for all elected officials. I have also voluntarily taken the 16 furlough days instituted by Governor Doyle and in January (before the budget adjustment bill was even introduced) I informed our human resources department that I wanted to begin voluntarily paying for my portion of my pension benefits. Finally, since being elected I have not taken the state employee health insurance plan and will only do so in the future if I have no alternative health insurance options.

    • I am a retired public worker. How will this affect my pension?
    There will be no impact to current retirees.



    Read more: http://www.vcstar.com/news/2011/mar/08/anger-brews-over-government-workers-benefits/#ixzz1G7onHgPW
    - vcstar.com

    ReplyDelete